In 2000, Bush was better on Gore on the most important issue, war, but as President he switched positions and became the world's biggest threat to peace. Presidential candidates break promises, and there is very little we can do about it.
I,like many others, would wish we could rewind and see how a Gore Presidency would turn out. But the fact is, the Clinton-Gore position of murdering innocent foreign peoples "for their own good" was intolerable. True, Gore would probably have been better than Bush, but the 2000 campaign didn't demonstrate it.
Barack Obama is presumably smarter and more knowledgeable than McCain - at least he comes across that way. And, as Bush did in 2000, he's taking the relatively more moderate and humane view toward foreign affairs than his rival.
But what does that prove?
James Leroy Wilson's one-man magazine.
Thursday, June 05, 2008
Vote For What You Want
This is my latest at the Partial Observer. Excerpt:
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Bob Barr,
elections,
John McCain,
Partial Observer,
politics,
third parties